Friday, October 23, 2009

Saying Goodbye to a Friend

While I expected to say goodbye to this friend soon, I did not expect to say goodbye to her today.

Intermittently since we took her in I had various thoughts of "we're going to have to say good-bye to her" at some stage. She joined us and she would always leave us. At times it would be natural to wonder why would we let ourselves face the tragedy of her inevitable departure by getting to know her in the first place.

But that theory implies that the fifteen years that we were cemented in union were not worth the depression that came from her departure. When I look back and remember any moment in her life I have to smile and laugh at her energy, audacity and charm. Any bad time that we had together and indeed, even this current bereavement is tempered by her supremely happy life. As time passes I know that these good times will fully blast away this malaise and a burning bright memory of her pure soul will remain.

I could try to describe these good memories or try to explain the basis of our relationship. But our friendship was one that was never based on words. There was an understanding between us that could never be summed up by language. I cannot articulate this connection and nor do I want to. For these memories are ours alone and would seem trivial to anyone else.

But I will say this, there was nothing trivial about our relationship. I loved her.

-The English Student

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Zombieland: Film Review

Cross-genre films can only be successful if both genres are executed without compromising the core of either. Zombieland is the latest attempt by Ruben Fleischer to combine the horror and comedy genres.

The first question has to be is it successful as a horror film? Ultimately the answer is yes. Zombieland highlights how far technology and make-up artistry have come with the amazingly vivid and highly disgusting zombies that are constantly on display. There are some wonderfully jump inducing moments that had my pulse going and real tension due to the eerie and atmospheric settings. Along with these points of excellence, director Ruben Fleischer ticks the rest of the horror checklist with plenty of violence, gore and chase scenes. As a horror film then, Zombieland excels at times and at the very least works throughout.

The next question is whether this film works as a comedy and crucially, if humour is used in a successful way without negatively affecting the horror atmosphere. Again, the answer to both of these questions has to be yes. Woody Harrelson is utterly hilarious at times, while Jesse Eisenberg shows that he is a talent for the future. There is also something perversely funny in watching Abigail "Little Miss Sunshine" Breslin shooting ravenous zombies with a shotgun. Capping this off with a classic cameo equates to an excellent comedy performance by the entire cast. Trying to create humour from a horror base is extremely difficult. Many directors and film makers have made the mistake of affixing cheap humour to an already created piece. Zombieland however, shows us that when comedy is interwoven with the horror elements to create a plot the result is highly entertaining.

I was shown a trailer for this film a few months ago and could not help but grimace. A basically washed up Woody Harrelson in yet another pathetic attempt at combining horror and comedy made me understandably wary. I was content with relying on the brilliant "Shaun of the Dead" for this kind of film. It was in fact luck that resulted in me actually seeing Zombieland. But my preconceived notions were ridiculously off base. As these wonderfully crafted zombies attacked the easily loveable cast, it was hard not to imagine them as representations of recent Hollywood trends. The 'undead' franchises and over-used stock characterisations and plot elements of most Hollywood films are assaulting a core of artists like Ruben Fleischer that are attempting to defend the medium of film.

We should absolutely support this desperate last stand before they are over-run by the vicious mediocrity of Hollywood.

-The English Student

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Can We Have Our Nobel Prize Now?

Barack Obama? Really?!

I was completely shocked yesterday to wake up and find that U.S. President Barack Obama had been awarded the Nobel Prize for peace. From 205 nominees, the Nobel Committee decided that this international celebrity was deserving of this prize, despite the fact that he was nominated eleven days after taking office and is just coming off the back of a complete failure in the international community after his attempt to bring the Olympics to his home of Chicago. This president has not even achieved what he intended in his short term domestically, let alone in foreign policy.

But wait, lets ignore the escalating war in Afghanistan and the inequitable steps taken in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict for a moment and give the Nobel Committee some credit. Perhaps we should look at the reason cited for awarding the peace prize to Barack Obama. "The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons." When we consider that Obama has really done very little to work for a world without nuclear weapons, it is clear that this award is for intentions. Giving a peace prize for the intentions of peace and for the potential of peace is simply ridiculous. Surely the Nobel Committee should be more concerned with tangible efforts that have really helped create peace in the world, not hopeful promises. They don't award Olympic medals for people who intend to excel and they should not for what was once the most illustrious award one could receive.

There is an even worse implication from this award. What straight thinking, empathetic and decent person would not wish for a world without nuclear weapons? Even political "hawks" would happily get rid of these abominations if it could be assured that they were completely eradicated from every country. In giving this award for the vision of Barack Obama, the Nobel Committee has implied that this vision of peace is lacking in everyone else. Apparently, Obama's hope for world peace is more pure and wholesome than ours and so should be awarded. In effect, the Nobel Committee has derided the rest of humanity that had a vision of world peace long before Obama appeared.

The Nobel Committee needs to award everyone a peace prize or fall into disrepute. This is the only way to give the rest of us our robbed dignity back.

-The English Student

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Latent Agnosia

Agnosia refers to neurological conditions that cause a person to lose perception or understanding. I believe that we can use the term 'Latent Agnosia' to describe a more widespread pattern of misunderstanding.

As a neurological condition, agnosia has its basis in specific human brains that are affected by the disorder. 'Latent Agnosia' affects us all. In my current situation I frequently feel empty and hollow. I have lost some things in the last few months that have left me bereft of the passion or drive to really do anything. Indeed, I do not have the desire to dig myself out of this hole. But why do I feel this way? My understanding is based on two things. First, the past figures prominently in my perception of myself. When elements of this past depart I am left with an emptiness. Second, the future bears down heavily on this perception. I frequently wonder if things will ever be fulfilling. In a previous post I touched on the problems that emerge when we base our existence too much in the past or in the future. In short, our mental understanding of a situation is warped by the many lenses we use to view it. My current mental understanding is warped by an unhealthy fixation with the past and the future. While I may be the same person I always was, I feel like I am in a much more difficult situation than before. I worry about my circumstances despite the fact that there is no objective basis for this fear. Obviously I am not the only one that undergoes these patterns. Society is full of people that do not understand their own situation. Risk takers often do not recognise risks, people prone to panic do not recognise how unnecessary panic is, addicts do not recognise the severity of their situation while office workers do not recognise the banality of theirs. These are simple examples that underline a common foundation: we get so wrapped up in our own world that we lose all understanding of the true situations we face.

There is also a social level to these patterns. Countless economic experts, politicians and ordinary people have identified our current economic realities as apocalyptic. The sky certainly does seem to be falling around us as banks fold and the prosperity of the past disappears. These seem to be uncharted waters we are facing, with unprecedented trials and consequences. But there is a precedent. There have been at least ten 'market crashes' since the eighties and many more financial crises. While this current economic recession may not be on the same scale as these crashes, it absolutely follows the same patterns. The Great Depression too offers an archetype for widespread economic difficulty. One would think that it also offered a warning of potential crises based on our economic systems. The Great Depression was heralded by failures in the economic system that we had created and the exact same thing is happening now.If we take the apparent fragility of these systems as identified by the frequent crashing of the market and the vast depths that an economic crisis such as The Great Depression can reach it is a certainty that we would face these patterns again. Yet here we are, in free fall and surprised by it. Countless other social issues undergo the same pattern. It seems that we are constantly on the verge of another world war as international tension grows and subsides in many different regions. Old world orders are replaced by new ones and many politicians offer their people change and progress that will free them from social crises. But what is changing and where is the progress? These social crises are seen as unique or new when in fact they are just expressions of past issues. We are blinded by a nostalgic view of past societies that we believe were free of these problems. We are also blinded by the belief that the future will bring us freedom from these problems. Our collective mental understanding of human society is warped by these fixations.

Our inability to recognise our own personal circumstances and our inability as a society to recognise our social circumstances exemplifies 'Latent Agnosia'. The thought processes that we use and the importance we place on certain elements of life equates to a misunderstanding of objective reality. We frequently misunderstand our circumstances and our world. I call this agnosia 'latent' because it is potentially present in all elements of our lives. So the question must be asked, can we escape this 'Latent Agnosia' and find some objective understanding of reality? While we attempt to create 'progress' in our lives or in society this is not possible. 'Progress' is an illusory term that shows a misunderstanding of the past and the future. So long as we focus on 'progress' we will remain trapped behind the warping lenses of the past and the future. Perhaps it is more useful to attempt to understand the underlying issues we face as individuals and as members of society. This strategy means that we should not look for 'progress' and instead should attempt to understand the connection our current situation has with other epochs. We should not attempt to defeat our 'Latent Agnosia', we should try to understand it and in this way approach some kind of objective understanding of reality.

After one hundred posts I could naturally ask myself what progress have I made. The conclusion I must arrive at is that while I have not contributed to any idea of 'progress', I have at least contributed to my own understanding.

-The English Student