As the Beijing Olympics approach, the level of unrest and discord regarding the event has increased.
Recently, activists supporting the rights of Tibetan citizens have taken to the streets, disrupting the Olympic Relay in France and San Francisco. These people believe that the Chinese government does not have the right to keep the Tibetan region under their control. In addition to this, demonstrators have spoken out against the exiling of the current Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso. In response to this upheaval, Chinese citizens have called for the embargo of French goods and businesses. Consequently, many have begun to call for a boycott of the Games. I for one, support this rejection for two reasons.
The excuses of the Chinese government for Tibetan subjugation have reached ridiculous proportions. Their propaganda has included the bizarre accusation that the Dalai Lama, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, has been encouraging violence. I believe that a boycott of the Beijing Games would force the Chinese government to drop all deception and engage in real, worthwhile negotiations with Tibet.
Secondly, a rejection of these games would send a message in relation to media censorship in China. Should many countries decide to stay away from this year’s Olympic Games, it will be impossible for Hu Jintao to continue to isolate the Chinese state. The exterior forces of the world will be sending a clear message that their input and influence in the world is important and to separate a population from this force is downright cruel.
The Olympic motto states: "Swifter, Higher, Stronger" and it is the responsibility of the international community to ensure that these ideals are resolutely upheld.
-The English Student
Friday, April 18, 2008
Beijing Olympics - Boycott?
Labels:
Beijing 2008,
Carrefour,
China,
France,
Hu Jintao,
olympic boycott,
Olympic Games,
protests,
Tibet
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment